The Fight continues, but the truth will come out. Our Motion for Rehearing exposes that over $25 million (conservatively) in commission gains were filtered out of the key gain-loss data presented to the jury. The jury was told these were losses, but these were actually gains. The jury was repeatedly lied to. How can this injustice stand? There was repeated false testimony by four key witnesses- Reynolds, Keep, Sauber, and McClelland. The attorneys did not get into explaining the fact that two years of non-I2G data were misrepresented as I2G data, with repeated false testimony from three key witnesses.
I found the Feb 2025 Supreme Court case, Glossip, which supports the appropriate standard for evaluating false evidence or a Napue Violation. The prosecution had the obligation to correct the false testimony. The defense did not have the obligation to learn of the government’s deception and challenge the manipulations of data that they had no way of knowing about during the trial. If there is any sense of justice, this will positively impact our chances of obtaining a new trial, which is demanded through the Supreme Court’s rulings in Glossip.