Corrupt DOJ Efforts to Criminalize MLM Recruiting Through the I2G Case Puts All MLMs and Their Distributors at Risk
The truth about the corrupt practices of the I2G prosecutors reveals why their misconduct now poses a threat to your MLM livelihood. You could face criminal prosecution for your recruiting efforts, regardless of your identity or the MLM company you represent. It’s essential to stay informed and join the fight for justice to protect your right to pursue your MLM dreams for years to come.
In the I2G case, prosecutors misled the judge about their own witnesses’ statements regarding exonerating commission data, which disproved their entire case. After the trial, the data provider issued an affidavit confirming the misconduct, which involved filtering out $28 million in gains earned by I2G distributors.
The prosecutors defrauded the court by fabricating a 97% loss rate, misrepresenting $28 million in gains as $28 million in losses, and presenting this misleading information as accurate gain-loss representations through their key expert witnesses. Such actions constitute a fraud on the court and may also suggest suborning perjury.
Evidence of the government’s misconduct is supported by sworn statements through its data provider and by admissions in its appeal response, which acknowledge their awareness of the falsity of their I2G data which filtered out 28 million dollar paid to alleged victims, and misrepresented 2 1/2 years of data from a separate company Xtg1 that operated AFTER I2G WAS CLOSED as if it belonged to I2G.
The XtG1 post-closure data was used to compile all seven critical spreadsheets, which distorted every statistical representation. When questioned about data beyond the established timeline, Madison Sewell lied to the judge, asserting that it was representative of I2G. As a result, the judge trusted the prosecution and believed their untruths, leading to the presentation of radically inflated and fictitious losses throughout the trial.
Despite acknowledging falsities in their data in their appeal brief to defend against claims of perjury by their witnesses, the government has never corrected the record to inform the court about the $28 million in gains that were excluded or the 2.5 years of data from a separate company used inappropriately.