by admin | Aug 17, 2025 | Uncategorized
Anti-saturation, Anti-pyramid Anti-Security, Anti-Scheme to Defraud The Appeal Panel failed to understand Hosseinipour’s argument about anti-saturation plans. Instead, the panel focused solely on the legitimacy of the 5,000-person cap, which Judge Nalbandian conceded...
by admin | Aug 16, 2025 | Uncategorized
The Fight continues, but the truth will come out. Our Motion for Rehearing exposes that over $25 million (conservatively) in commission gains were filtered out of the key gain-loss data presented to the jury. The jury was told these were losses, but these were...
by admin | Aug 13, 2025 | Uncategorized
Nos. 23-5029 and 23-5560 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICARespondent-Appelleev.FARADAY HOSSEINIPOURPetitioner-AppellantOn Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Western District of Kentucky PETITION FOR...
by admin | Aug 10, 2025 | Uncategorized
Anzalone- Examples of Prejudice: Lack of Limiting Instruction The Appeal Court applied an improper standard and overlooked or misunderstood Hosseinipour’s key argument on the misuse of Anzalone’s guilty plea and the lack of a limiting instruction. Summary The 6th...
by admin | Aug 10, 2025 | Uncategorized
Six of the 6th Circuit Court judges acknowledged a substantial legal issue related to Hosseinipour’s ineffective assistance of counsel. One three-judge panel ordered her release from prison pending appeal based on this issue. It cited an abuse of...
by admin | Aug 7, 2025 | Uncategorized
Summary of False Evidence Error by the Appeal Court and Substantial Impact Against the Interest of Justice. The Appeal Panel misunderstood the significant impact that knowingly presenting false data and testimony through four key witnesses had on the integrity of the...
