by admin | May 21, 2025 | Uncategorized
Chuck King’s significant role in dismantling I2G and ensuring that the defendants faced prison time is discussed in a previous blog. Without King’s involvement, I2G might still be operational and thriving today. The I2G plan was unique in that customer...
by admin | May 18, 2025 | Uncategorized
The Government continues to mischaracterize I2G’s Business Model and Securities Law The government mischaracterizes the I2G business model against the weight of its evidence,...
by admin | May 17, 2025 | Uncategorized
The government’s evidence against Hosseinipour was so weak that they resorted to combing through all of her emails in search of a damaging statement. It’s telling that their most significant discovery was an exchange with Bruce Deery, a non-emperor and...
by admin | May 16, 2025 | Uncategorized
Saturation is Necessary to Prove a Pyramid Scheme In its response brief, the Government argues that market saturation is not a necessary element of a “pyramid-scheme prosecution.” (Br.36.) To the...
by admin | May 15, 2025 | Uncategorized
The i2G plan focused on the continuous release of new and exciting digital products that would allow customer usage to generate ongoing profits for distributors, without the need for continuous recruitment. This ambitious strategy aimed to redirect consumer purchases...
by admin | May 14, 2025 | Uncategorized
The issue of ineffective assistance of counsel was first raised regarding Hosseinipour’s attorney, who is her brother-in-law, in Motions 29 and 33. These motions requested a new trial on that basis or sought an evidentiary hearing due to the substantial evidence...
