Neora Vs. I2G Tragedy of Two Tales

There are No Federal Laws that define pyramid schemes. The Neora Triumph Over Vague Laws highlights the risks to mlm participants when courts ignore the fine line which separates legitimate MLMs from pyramid schemes and create their own law.

A Day of Reckoning For MLM

A Devastating Precedent Threatens MLM. No One Should Face Criminal Prosecution With No Laws to Guide Their Actions

The Neora Case Highlights Evidentiary Disparities Which Cleared Neora But Landed I2G Participants in Prison.

The I2G Court denied clarifying instructions that separate legitimate mlms and pyramid schemes. Blurred lines now threaten well-intentioned distributors.

Click Here

False Evidence Fraud on The Court

The critical data used to  prove I2G was a pyramid scheme included a separate company,  XTG1 which  ran for two and a half years AFTER I2G Closed.  32 million dollars in commission earnings by I2G distributors was also filtered out to inflate losses and hide gains,

Click Here

I2G Was Not a Pyramid Scheme

I2G had valuable products with customer “usage” which accumulated BV and paid “rewards” through the I2G pay plan. Rewards received from  I2G casino, fantasy sports, and social casino customer transactions disprove a pyramid scheme.

Click Here

The I2G Emperor Packages were Not Securities

Casino rewards were solely dependent on distributor’s efforts.  “Effort of Others” which drive rewards  precludes a security

Click Here

Denied of Any Defense Ineffective Counsel

At every phase . Hosseinipour was denied a constitutionally required effective defense.

Click Here

Misuse of Anzalone Guilty Plea

Anzalone’s Guilty Plea was misused and  gutted mens rea,

Click Here

The I2G Emperor Packages were Not Securities by Law

Our Videos highlight Judicial Errors Under Review by the Appeals Court which Prevented a Fair Trial in the I2G Case and Threaten the Future of Millions of well-intentioned distributors.

Click Here

Keep, False Evidence, Perjury and Misrepresentation of Law

The Pyramid Scheme conclusion was based on biased opinions, rigid theories, and false data. Defense Expert Was Denied.

Click Here

Criminal Intent or Mens rea was Not Required For Guilt

Our Videos highlight Judicial Errors Under Review by the Appeals Court which Prevented a Fair Trial in the I2G Case and Threaten the Future of Millions of well-intentioned distributors.

Click Here

Jury Instruction Provided Improper Definitions and Instructions

Our Videos highlight Judicial Errors Under Review by the Appeals Court which Prevented a Fair Trial in the I2G Case and Threaten the Future of Millions of well-intentioned distributors.

Click Here

There was an Insufficiency of Evidence to Convict Hosseinipour or Barnes

Our Videos highlight Judicial Errors Under Review by the Appeals Court which Prevented a Fair Trial in the I2G Case and Threaten the Future of Millions of well-intentioned distributors.

Click Here

The trial was tainted with false summary charts, investigative hearsay from non-testifying persons who could not be confronted.

Click Here

Ruan and Percoco Demand Reversal

Lack of Mens Rea Instructions, Vague Definitions and Lack of Regulatory Standards can not form the basis of fraud prosecutions.

Click Here

Defense Expert Denied

The denial of their Pyramid Scheme Expert the day before trial denied a fair trial.

Click Here

The Importance of Defending MLM

Critical Legal Battles for
MLM Freedom

In the I2G case, Pyramid Scheme was automatically defined as “mail fraud” or a crime against the government. However, a pyramid scheme is based solely on vague regulatory concepts such as “over-focus on recruiting” or “too few customers” which are not laws or even “formal guidance.” Nor do they make a pyramid scheme, a “scheme to defraud.” or a criminal enterprise Distributors join companies with products they believe in. Participating in an mlm that includes “recruiting” can now make you a felon..

Participating in an MLM can now result in prison if your company has arbitrary “characteristics of a pyramid scheme,” such as “over-focus” on recruiting, lack of earnings, or small numbers of high earners. According to the FTC, this description applies to all MLM companies.

19 Appeal Briefs Arguments Resulted in Miscarriage of Justice

Understand the magnitude of errors and prosecutorial misconduct which resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

Support MLM Freedom

Join us in defending the rights of MLM distributors. Watch the videos, understand the legal battles, and help us ensure justice. Your support can make a difference in protecting the future of MLM businesses.

Legal Arguments